Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"


Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.


    No Rating Available

Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

Nestled somewhere in Connecticut, the upscale suburban utopia of Stepford offers residents an insular community with a personality—and secrets—all its own. That’s where Joanna and Walter choose to start fresh after Joanna loses her job as a big-shot television producer and does a stint in a mental hospital. Stepford looks to be just the ticket. A quiet town. A relaxed pace. A chance to get out of the city and reconnect with the things that matter. The family doesn’t realize that Stepford is essentially a retirement community for rich, middle-aged nerds who want to turn their strong-willed, talented wives into agreeable automatons.

Joanna has a hard time fitting in. A feisty, amoral career woman, she’s suddenly surrounded by gorgeous trophy wives who stare vacantly, talk in unison and adorn themselves 24-7 in perky flowered dresses like demented Suzie Homemakers who live only to please their husbands. When they’re not shopping, baking or keeping an immaculate home, these dumbed-down nymphets are making midday love to their geeky mates. No ambition. No independent thought. No passion.

The women of Stepford pledge allegiance to the synthetic smile of Claire, the town’s matronly, Waspy facilitator of all things feminine. Claire’s husband, Mike, presides over the mysterious men’s club, a fraternity that lets adult males behave like boys.

Joanna, with the help of Bobbi (an angry Jewish writer) and Roger (a flamboyant homosexual), sets out to determine what’s wrong with the Stepford wives. Based on a 1975 thriller starring Katharine Ross, this far more comedic remake serves up its feminist social commentary like a bundt cake liberally glazed with liberal humor.

Positive Elements

Offered a buxom babe on a TV reality show, a man chooses to remain faithful to his wife. When a woman appears to have a seizure, Joanna rushes to her aid and insists that she get proper medical attention. Faced with being “upgraded” into an emotionless fembot, Joanna wonders if Stepford wives can tell their husbands “I love you��� and mean it. This raises the question of whether it’s better to have someone’s absolute, unquestioning loyalty, or risk being rejected by a loved one able to exercise free will (an issue our Creator faced, electing to give humans the right to choose).

Joanna races to protect her children upon learning that they might be in danger. Walter acts bravely in his wife’s best interest. Claire longs for the days of romance and beauty when “men were men and women were cherished.” Characters agree that perfection is highly overrated. Claire says Stepford has “no crime, no poverty and no pushing.” This line, like many in the movie, esteem old-fashioned values most families would appreciate. Unfortunately, common-sense virtue is often expressed with a cloying sentimentality that makes it seem quaint and unrealistic.

Spiritual Content

Claire recommends that the ladies’ group study a book of Christmas crafts, saying that she wants to celebrate the birth of her lord Jesus in yarn. She is then insensitive to Bobbi, who is Jewish. Mike says of the men subjugating their wives, “We decided to become gods!” A homosexual talks about the power of prayer and refers to his “partner in the Lord.”

Sexual Content

A quiz show host asks a male and a female contestant, “Who wishes they were married to a hot, sexy lesbian?” Both players ring in. A TV reality show called I Can Do Better! separates a loving couple and tempts each with the companionship of adult-film stars (the wife chooses hedonism and tells her hubby he’s history). A remote control is used to enlarge a lingerie-clad woman’s breasts. Joanna and Walter talk about having gone a year without sex. A couple is overheard having loud sex that ends with the woman’s deafening cry of euphoria.

Jerry and Roger are a gay couple who moved to Stepford. They dance together and swap innuendoes. Mike tells Jerry, “You’ll find that Stepford is very open-minded and we welcome you and your partner just like any other couple.” Since Roger is the effeminate one, he’s not invited to the men’s club, which leads him to ask if the guys there recreate with “hookers, old Playboys and cable porn.” Bobbi makes a crass comment about a vibrator. Breasts are visible on computerized images of “blank” women.

Violent Content

A female's programming malfunctions, causing her to spin and fall over violently. After having his life ruined on a cruel reality TV show, a guy fires a gun at Joanna. (It is implied that he had already killed four men and critically wounded his wife.) A woman receives a vicious electric shock. Joanna decapitates a robot with a sharp blow to the head. A woman confesses to killing her husband and his mistress. There are several references to castration.

Crude or Profane Language

About a dozen profanities, two-thirds of which are exclamations of “my god.” Walter misuses the name of Jesus Christ once. There are sexual innuendoes and frank references to male anatomy.

Drug and Alcohol Content

Partygoers enjoy champagne and Scotch. Men gather at a club to smoke cigars and drink alcohol. Joanna, Bobbi and Roger compare their experiences on prescription drugs such as Xanax and Zoloft. Roger says he prefers Prozac with a Viagra chaser.

Other Negative Elements

Although characters talk of putting to rest notions of “perfection,” there seems to be an underlying desire to, at the same time, eliminate “standards.” In the end, “perfection” becomes filmspeak for outmoded ideals, some of which (fidelity, gender roles, marriage between one man and one woman, etc.) should be preserved.


Are the Stepford wives being turned into actual robots or are they flesh-and-blood women with microchips attached to their brains? The movie can’t seem to make up its mind. But its position is clear about one thing—Gloria Steinem needs to wring Betty Crocker’s neck. And that’s the real issue here. While Stepford Wives’ plot definitely has its shortcomings, they pale in comparison to those of the modern feminist movement.

In recent decades thousands of women who swallowed the hook of feminism have regretted chasing the lure. They took the career track. Some rejected marriage, believing that “needing a man” was a sign of weakness. Others wed, but were so busy pursuing self-actualization that they delayed starting a family until, for one reason or another, their window of opportunity closed. While there will always be zealous feminists who never experience a twinge of doubt, countless others are second-guessing the party line. This movie seems committed to winning them back.

I fully expected the credits to say, “Officially endorsed by the National Organization for Women." And that NOW "oversaw all aspects of production to insure that no females were domesticated in the making of this film.” Kidman’s character reminds ladies that their own dreams and satisfaction supercede their responsibilities as wives and mothers. One exchange finds the newly converted Bobbi telling Joanna mechanically, “I understand what’s important in life. My husband ... my children.” Totally dumbfounded, Joanna looks at this poor, pathetic creature as if the worst thing that could’ve happened to her was to discover the joys of being a stay-at-home mom.

Diane Passno referred to the 1975 film in her eye-opening book Feminism: Mystique or Mistake? She says, “No woman wants to play the part of one of the Stepford Wives, a movie about women whose husbands replaced them with robots. But neither should we be the robots that the feminists want us to be, accepting their definition of our roles without question. ... Because the role of ‘family nurturer’ placed women traditionally in the home, the feminist movement, as early as the mid-1960s, stressed that was the last place in the world a woman should want to be.” She goes on to say, “If the homemaker role was to be debased, the role of the man as provider and protector also had to be dismantled.”

Similarly, this remake reinforces the notion that a homemaker is a slave bound by apron strings threatening to cut off circulation to the brain—Proverbs 31 woman as fembot. It also does its best to emasculate and vilify husbands. Other targets include Republicans, corporate America and insensitive Christians.

That’s not to say there aren’t good messages here. The film tells men to love and respect their wives for who they are, and stop comparing them to unrealistic standards of beauty and perfection. It points out that love given freely is most valuable. But is it worth standing in a stream of feminist propaganda to pan for those nuggets? I guess it all depends on your worldview. How much viewers enjoy this occasionally clever, yet flawed comedy/thriller will depend on how they feel about the lifestyles and values being ridiculed onscreen.

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles



Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews



Readability Age Range



Nicole Kidman as Joanna Eberhart; Matthew Broderick as Walter Kresby; Bette Midler as Bobbi Markowitz; Christopher Walken as Mike Wellington; Glenn Close as Claire Wellington; Jon Lovitz as Dave Markowitz; Faith Hill as Sara Sunderson; Roger Bart as Roger Bannister


Frank Oz ( )


Paramount Pictures



Record Label



In Theaters

On Video

Year Published



Bob Smithouser

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!