Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"


Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.


Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

"Good afternoon, director Brad Bird. The situation is this: The economy is still in the dumps. People are spending money on jumbo bundles of ramen instead of going to see The Sitter. The 3-D thing doesn't seem to be the draw it once was, the Harry Potter series has been spooled out to the very end of the reel and, really, how much longer will folks actually pay to see Transformers flicks? I'm sure you can appreciate the terrible peril in which the movie industry finds itself. And while we thought for a moment about producing a thoughtful, original, big-budget blockbuster, wiser heads prevailed and decided that what moviegoers really need is another sequel.

"Mission: Impossible was a natural choice.

"Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to create something that feels fresh and exciting while using the same franchise tropes and lines that date back to the late 1960s. Create a plot using the studio's patented script-o-matic device and input the following variables: 'rogue Russians,' 'Dubai,' 'nuclear war' and 'explosions.' Make sure you add several exclamation marks after that last one. And be sure to incorporate a number of super-cool gadgets, death-defying stunts (maybe have your hero run down the side of a skyscraper or something).

"In the interest of time, we've assembled your team for you: Tom Cruise will, naturally, star—reprising his role as superspy Ethan Hunt. He will be assisted by up-and-comer Jeremy Renner (we're grooming him to become the focal point of the series once Cruise no longer looks good sans shirt), beautiful Paula Patton and quirky British comic Simon Pegg.

"Brad, we know this is your first live-action film, but don't sweat it. We spoke with the Secretary about your work on Ratatouille and The Incredibles, and he's confident you can tell a good story. In fact, he's hoping you can actually tune up this vehicle a bit.

"Oh, and speaking of cars, we almost forgot to tell you that we've signed a weighty product-placement contract with BMW. The script-o-matic will build that in if you input the word 'shill.'

"Good luck, Brad. You're on your own now. If the movie tanks, the studio will disavow any knowledge of actually hiring you. This message will self-destruct in five seconds."

[Note: Spoilers are contained in the following sections.]

Positive Elements

Most of us would agree that trying to save the world from nuclear holocaust is a good thing, so right from the get-go these Impossible Missions Force agents have that going for them. And they constantly risk their lives for folks who will be (if all goes well) forever clueless as to their sacrifice. Their enemies are out to kill them. Their own government is always threatening to disown them. And yet Hunt and Co. press on, because they're the only ones who can. The determination they display is, quite frankly, inspiring.

The fact that the spies work as a team is another positive. While some previous Mission: Impossible incarnations cast Ethan as almost a solo superhero getting just ancillary support from his cohorts, now he's fully embedded in his unit. "The only thing that functioned properly was this team," Ethan says.

We learn that Ethan fabricated his wife's death in order to protect her, but that fabrication also means he sacrificed his ability to be with her. We could—and will—quibble with the details, but couldn't—and won't—with the idea that Ethan would punt his own happiness for the safety and well-being of his wife, which is a grand expression of selfless love. "It wasn't your job to protect her," he tells someone who was supposedly watching over her. "It was mine."

Spiritual Content

An evil Russian named Hendricks—who claims that nuclear war may be an "unpleasant but necessary part of evolution"—offers up a strange petition to the heavens as his nefarious plan comes together: "May there be peace on earth," he says, eyes cast skyward.

Sexual Content

Women sport low necklines and other curve-hugging attire. Ethan is shown shirtless. Two agents kiss as part of a ruse.

Agent Jane Carter seduces an Indian media mogul in a complex sting operation. (Her dress showcases her cleavage and leg.) He asks if she wants to see his private art collection (the key word for him is private) and leads her through a gallery of erotic Indian art. (We see paintings of couples engaged in foreplay; one features an exposed breast). In the gallery, Jane twists the mogul's arm and slaps his face—actions that he interprets as a rough prelude to sex.

Violent Content

Jane and the mogul eventually wind up in his bedroom where she puts him in a stranglehold and threatens to kill him. After he tells her what she needs to know, she injects him with a drug that knocks him out.

Surrounding that scene, the body count mounts as we wade through dozens of fistfights, shootouts, car chases and explosions. At times the action feels fairly cartoonish—not too far removed from the stormtroopers who get mowed down in the Death Star. At others, it can feel harsh and bleak.

Hendricks kidnaps a weapons expert, holding his family hostage until the man can get a job done for him. When the deed is done, the weapons guy asks if he can rejoin his wife and son. The bad guy says yes—and then shoots him several times in the chest. He suggests that the rest of the family was killed earlier.

Two men are shot in a moving vehicle, one graphically in the head. Two others escape from the car while under heavy fire as the vehicle sinks into a river; they use one of the dead bodies as a decoy. Two women fight in a high-rise. It ends when one of them gets kicked out of a window. An agent shoots a bevy of pursuing enemies, only to be shot several times in the gut by an assassin. The assassin clutches her victim close to her, as if in an embrace—shooting him twice more to finish the job.

We see characters nursing ugly wounds to the face and holding clothes to plug bullet holes. Ethan escapes from prison after his partners initiate a riot. Prisoners beat on each other and on the guards. Ethan knocks around several people—both prisoners and guards—as he escapes. There's a massive fight in a parking garage: Combatants injure one another; an arm and a leg are broken in snap-crackle-pop fashion. The fight concludes when someone leaps off a ledge, grotesquely hitting the ground. (He survives the fall only briefly.) Ethan crashes his car into an oncoming SUV, sending the latter flying. Someone drives another car off a ledge. The vehicle is totaled; the driver survives—thanks to a timely airbag. (BMW's next ad: "If you drive off a cliff, our airbags will save you!")

Ethan, we're told, killed six Serbians "in cold blood" to avenge his wife's murder. Those revenge killings are problematic enough, naturally … but then when we learn that the woman is actually alive, this adds another ethical problem: Were these deaths "needed" just to preserve her safety? Were they part of another IMF mission? Both? It's a bit unclear, though we do know his actions got Ethan sent to a pretty harsh prison. Either way, the idea of heroic Ethan Hunt killing so callously is bothersome (and, frankly, out of character).

Crude or Profane Language

One s-word. We hear about a dozen milder profanities including "a‑‑" "d‑‑n" and "h‑‑‑." There are a half-dozen misuses of God's name. An apparent Russian swear word is uttered; for those of us who don't speak the language, we see in the subtitles a series of asterisks and symbols. A man hoists his middle finger.

Drug and Alcohol Content

Good guys and bad guys alike drink whiskey, beer and champagne. Several smoke cigarettes. We see a poster of a Shirley Temple-looking child smoking a pipe. A knock-out drug is administered.

Other Negative Elements

Spy work—particularly cinematic spy work—involves a lot of subterfuge, misdirection and some serious fibbing. Ethan and his fellows constantly mislead their enemies—and sometimes their own government in a wink-wink sort of way. They steal cellphones, clothes and even a car while escaping from or chasing down evildoers. They deface and damage private and public property. Ethan flees law enforcement officials.

It's not really in our purview to say whether this kind of behavior is justified or not (not wanting to cross swords with any real-life secret agents who might be reading), but we can say that none of these actions should be encouraged among the rest of us.


Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol has its share of content concerns. Characters kill and die and lie and sometimes behave very badly. But since the films doesn't push its PG-13 rating, it somehow feels, as far as actioners go, relatively clean. The bullets fly with alarming frequency, but harsh profanity is restricted to a single s-word and a finger gesture. Bombs go off, but clothes stay on. Some of what we hear Ethan did is troubling. But what we actually see him do is better, content-wise, than anything we absorb from Jason Bourne or James Bond these days.

Brad Bird succeeded in his mission: He made a decades-old franchise feel fresh and exciting, even while staying true to its roots and tropes. He crafted a film that, while not nearly as innocent as, say, The Incredibles, still seems to keep (at least partially) in mind that kids do go to see this stuff.

Not that they necessarily should.

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles



Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews



Readability Age Range



Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt; Paula Patton as Jane Carter; Simon Pegg as Benji; Jeremy Renner as Brandt; Michael Nyqvist as Hendricks


Brad Bird ( )


Paramount Pictures



Record Label



In Theaters

December 15, 2011

On Video

April 17, 2012

Year Published



Paul Asay

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!