Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"


Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.


    No Rating Available

Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

In a perfect world, murderers would be caught before they could kill, and the innocent would never live in fear. But even when the coupling of science and humanity produces the tools to prevent crime before it occurs, people still manage to mess things up. It's 2054. Detective John Anderton is a pre-crime officer in Washington, D.C. He flies around with his jetpack, taking down bad guys before they can do bad things. And then John is identified as a future killer. In an instant, the full weight of the system he's fought so valiantly for and served so faithfully comes crashing down on top of him.

It's not a computer or an alien life-force that predicts future killers. It's three highly-sensitive precognitive people. Since murder so forcefully "disrupts the fabric of life," that's what they see the most clearly. Murder after murder after murder after murder. Their visions are recorded as fragmented video images for the police officers to scrutinize. The names of the victims and perpetrators are burned into wooden balls—which roll down a maze of Plexiglas pipe before plopping down in front of waiting enforcers (think of the system as a giant, Steven Spielberg-inspired Mousetrap game).

When John finds himself on the lam, desperately trying to prove his innocence of a crime he's yet to commit, his turbulent past reaches out to possess him. He and his wife lost their 6-year-old boy to an act of murder just before the "pre-cogs" effectively did away with capital crime. He's never recovered, and has devoted his life to sparing others the agony he's endured. That's a good thing, but his obsession led to divorce and drug addiction. He knows he's not going to kill the man he's "supposed to," but how is he going to convince anyone else? There's no such thing as a conspiracy in a system that never fails.

positive elements: Minority Report provides numerous opportunities to think about and discuss the idea of judging someone for what they might do instead of what they've done. Prosecuting potential criminals seems to have great appeal at first blush, but as Minority Report shows, there's more to justice than "keeping everyone safe." Only God knows a man's heart, and while Spielberg never evokes God's overarching presence, his portrayal of humanity's bumbling grasp on secret intent and future events speaks directly to this spiritual issue. The other area that gets specific attention is that of free will. A theme throughout is that John has choices. Just because a pre-cog predicted his actions, doesn't mean he has to go through with it. There is always a way out. (Look at 1 Cor. 10:13 for a biblical parallel.)

spiritual content: While spiritual lessons can be drawn from the film, its only overt spiritual content is negative. Predicting the future is essentially a spiritual ability. But Minority Report attributes precognitive abilities to nothing other than chance, chemical combinations and hyper-sensitivity. A man finding himself in the presence of one of the pre-cogs, falls to his knees in front of her, crosses himself and blasphemously utters the name of Jesus. Detectives refer to themselves as "more like priests than cops" since they directly change the course of destiny in people's lives.

sexual content: Opening scenes intertwine snippets of passionate kissing and a brutal stabbing. (It turns out that a man discovers his wife bedding someone else.) A holographic recording of John's ex-wife shows her wearing a nightie and enticing him to come to bed. While mechanical police drones (in the form of spiders) search an apartment building, the camera flits overhead, spying on people in their homes (one couple is having sex). Another hologram shows a man's sexual fantasy (the images are brief and distorted, but the sexual connotations are clear). Suggestive dialogue includes slang for sexual acts and even references the desires a man has for his cousin.

violent content: Disturbing, disjointed images of future murders play across police video screens. Drownings. Stabbings. Shootings. Strangulations. There's also a lot of violence while John runs from his former colleagues. Personal jetpacks allows for high-speed, airborne combat, raising the pursuit's stakes. John slams one of the cops against a wall and puts a gun to his chin (later he breaks a mirror with another man's head and points a gun at him, too). Stealing an officer's "sick stick," John immediately uses it, causing the victim to projectile vomit. Shockwave guns throw men across rooms, but futuristic methods of violence quickly give way to old-fashioned fisticuffs. At least two men are shot in the chest (blood spurts and oozes). There is also a suicide.

crude or profane language: One forceful f-word and a half-dozen s-words. The Lord's name is abused more than a dozen times.

drug and alcohol content: John is addicted to a futuristic substance called "clarity." He breathes in the drug using what looks like a modified asthma inhaler. While his doping is illegal and frowned on by officers who find out about it, John never comes clean and the issue is dropped without resolution. Also, there's a futuristic ad shown for beer, and alcohol is consumed by various characters.

other negative elements: [Spoiler Warning] Since security systems in John's world rely almost exclusively on retinal scans, eye transplants have become a black market gold mine. Running from his old unit, John undergoes a back-alley eyeball swap to hide his identity from public scanners. The portrayal of the surgery is relatively bloodless, but John takes his old eyes with him in a plastic baggie. In one scene, the bloody orbs get away from him and roll down a hallway. There's also talk about a plastic surgeon setting fire to his patients while they were under anesthesia. A subplot deals with the abduction and murder of children. A derelict makes an obscene gesture at police. A man is shown using the bathroom.

conclusion: Minority Report is an old-fashioned murder mystery dressed up in futuristic clothes. Sometimes those clothes are cool and comfy; other times they feel a bit stiff and scratchy. Personal jetpacks, spider drones, shockwave guns and bizarre elevator-style autos are all a bit over the top even for 2054. And the computers! If my wrists hurt now from pounding away at this keyboard, they'll be in eternal agony if Spielberg's vision for the future comes true. Computer users have to transform themselves into orchestra conductors just to keep the clunky things running. And don't get me started on those "invisible" flat plexi screens. To be sure, Minority Report's heart beats strongest when it focuses on the mystery, not the future.

A lot could be written about the sociopolitical ramifications of a justice system that pre-judges crime. And Spielberg quite expertly opens that can of worms. But don't expect Minority Report to explore the moral ramifications of its subject matter as much as A.I. did. (It's not nearly as melancholy, either.) This is much more a mystery than an exploration of the meaning of life. "It's like a whodunit," Spielberg says. "It's a 'who will do it.'" Spielberg even shot the film using a dim, grainy technique to evoke comparisons to the grand mysteries of yore. And it works. Based on a short story by the man who conceived Blade Runner (Philip K. Dick), the yarn spools out convincingly as John gradually learns why he has become a target. Hint: Politics and money are never bad guesses. The only big hole in the story's fabric is that John uses his old eyeballs to get back into his office while he's being pursued. Wouldn't the security codes be changed the instant he's fingered for the crime? Still, the story carries you along to a strong conclusion and the mystery is satisfactorily solved. Sadly, one cannot use the term "satisfactorily" in this context without weighing it down with a giant asterisk. And that asterisk denotes gore, violence, foul language and sexual content. Not easy things to get around even when there is a good story to be told.

Positive Elements

Spiritual Content

Sexual Content

Violent Content

Crude or Profane Language

Drug and Alcohol Content

Other Negative Elements


Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles



Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews



Readability Age Range



Tom Cruise as Detective John Anderton; Max von Sydow as Director Burgess; Steve Harris as Jad; Neal McDonough as Officer Fletcher; Patrick Kilpatrick as Knott; Jessica Capshaw as Evanna


Steven Spielberg ( )


20th Century Fox



Record Label



In Theaters

On Video

Year Published



Steven Isaac

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!