Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"


Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.


    No Rating Available

Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

Now living in London, crime-thriller novelist Catherine Trammell is arrested on suspicion of murder after being involved in a sex- and drug-fueled car accident that leaves her lover dead. Her crass lack of emotion prompts police detective Roy Washburn to bring in psychiatrist Dr. Michael Glass to determine if she poses a risk to herself or others. Although Michael testifies that she is indeed dangerous, Catherine is released on a technicality but visits the doctor for treatment of her "risk addiction." Against his own professional ethics, Michael agrees, and Catherine begins trying to seduce him.

Then people start dying—people who pose a risk to Michael's career, people sexually involved with Catherine, people being questioned by police detective Roy Washburn. As the victims pile up, Michael finds himself developing a deeper sexual attachment to Catherine even while becoming more convinced that she's a cold-blooded killer.

Positive Elements


Spiritual Content

A reporter says he "prays to God" that someone is a killer because it would make a good story. Another character compares a prominent psychiatrist to God and jokes about praying for his arrival.

Sexual Content

Those with any familiarity with the first Basic Instinct film won't be surprised to learn that the sexual content in this outing is aggressive, pervasive and unrelenting. The camera witnesses Catherine fully nude more than once and in multiple graphic sexual situations that feature sexual sounds, movement, rough "activities" (including erotic asphyxiation) and one glimpse of her in the midst of some kind of orgy. She also uses graphic and extremely crude language to describe sex-related circumstances both in conversations with men (to shock and seduce) and in voiced-over narratives from her books.

Another couple is shown nude having rough sex. In addition, the camera lingers on two partially unclothed corpses of men killed in the act of having sex, both with leather belts around their necks; crass, graphic language is used to describe what they were doing and how they died. A large naked man is seen being whipped by a woman in a leather outfit. Catherine claims or hints that she slept with two other female characters (not shown).

Violent Content

Adding to the perversity of Basic Instinct 2 is the connection between sex and murderous violence. In addition to the scenes described above, a sex-caused car accident leads to a drowning death, and a woman is discovered in a bathroom stall with her throat slit and covered in blood. In addition, a man is punched, another nearly drowns a nude woman in a hot tub, and one character fatally shoots another. Finally, a concluding flashback shows all the murders in more graphic detail.

Crude or Profane Language

In addition to around 10 misuses of God's and Jesus' names, the f-word is heard about two-dozen times. More pervasive is "dirty talk" that includes extremely obscene slang for male and female anatomy and various sex acts.

Drug and Alcohol Content

Pivotal to the (daft) story line is the question of whether Catherine drugged a man with something lethal while they were injecting other drugs. She and other characters smoke and drink throughout the film.

Other Negative Elements

It seems almost pointless to mention in light of the movie's thick layer of sexual and violent muck, but virtually every character seems to be lying about something. Or maybe everything. It's hard to tell. Either way, deception is the rule. Even the police detective admits to falsifying evidence to bring down bad guys.


Back in 1992, the original boundaries-tromping Basic Instinct nearly garnered an NC-17 rating for content that managed to outrage both vocal conservative groups and homosexual activists. The disturbing and graphic tale of sex and murder also became a worldwide box-office hit and propelled Sharon Stone to an odd stardom.

Fourteen years later, Basic Instinct 2 seems unlikely to inspire either outrage or ticket sales. The artlessness with which director Michael Caton-Jones constructs this ridiculous movie makes the whole queasy effort feel like some mid-'90s made-for-cable, late-night skin flick. When not utterly incomprehensible, the plot plods through a swamp of inane dialogue as characters spew psychobabble and misdirection. By the time the credits rolled, the bewildering double-reverse cop-out ending left me even less interested in figuring out who killed whom and why.

The boredom and confusion are, however, punctuated by scenes that define the word lurid. The 48-year-old Stone and Co. seem bent on showing us everything—and then a little more. It reminded me of the comedian who said she wasn't sick but made an appointment with her doctor because she'd been working out and wanted someone to see her naked. Stone is obviously in great shape for her age, but I would've gladly taken her word for it. The crass sexual dialogue and images are so forcefully pushed at the screen that they amplify the film's utter lack of discretion, entertainment value and meaning. In a word: ick.

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles



Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews



Readability Age Range



Sharon Stone as Catherine Tramell; David Morrissey as Michael Glass; David Thewlis as Roy Washburn; Charlotte Rampling as Dr. Milena Gardosh; Hugh Dancy as Adam Towers


Michael Caton-Jones ( )


Sony Pictures



Record Label



In Theaters

On Video

Year Published



Christopher Lyon

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!