Plugged In exists to shine a light on the world of popular entertainment while giving you and your family the essential tools you need to understand, navigate and impact the culture in which we live. Through reviews, articles and discussions, we want to spark intellectual thought, spiritual growth and a desire to follow the command of Colossians 2:8: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."


Family uses Plugged In as a ‘significant compass’

"I am at a loss for words to adequately express how much it means to my husband and me to know that there is an organization like Focus that is rooting for us. Just today I was reading Psalm 37 and thinking about how your ministry provides ways to 'dwell in the land and enjoy safe pasture.' We have two teenagers and an 8-year-old in our household...Plugged In has become a significant compass for our family. All three of our kids are dedicated to their walk with Christ but they still encounter challenges. Thanks for all of your research and persistence in helping us navigate through stormy waters."

Plugged In helps college student stand-up for his belief

"Thanks for the great job you do in posting movie and television reviews online. I’m a college freshman and I recently had a confrontational disagreement with my English professor regarding an R-rated film. It is her favorite movie and she wanted to show it in class. I went to your Web site to research the film’s content. Although I had not seen the movie myself, I was able to make an educated argument against it based on the concerns you outlined. The prof said that she was impressed by my stand and decided to poll the whole class and give us a choice. We overwhelmingly voted to watch a G-rated movie instead! I’ve learned that I can trust your site and I will be using it a lot in the future.”

Plugged In brings ‘Sanity and Order’ to Non-believer

“Even though I don’t consider myself a Christian, I find your Plugged In Web site useful and thought-provoking. No one reviews movies like you do. Instead of being judgmental, you put entertainment ‘on trial.’ After presenting the evidence, you allow the jury of your readers to decide for themselves what they should do. In my opinion, you bring sanity and order to the wild world of modern day entertainment. Keep up the good work!”

Mom thinks Plugged In is the ‘BEST Christian media review site’

"Our family doesn't go to the movies until we go online and check out your assessment of a given film. I think this is the BEST Christian media review website that I've found, and I recommend it to my family and friends. Keep up the good work!"


Our hope is that whether you're a parent, youth leader or teen, the information and tools at Plugged In will help you and your family make appropriate media decisions. We are privileged to do the work we do, and are continually thankful for the generosity and support from you, our loyal readers, listeners and friends.


    No Rating Available

Watch This Review

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Movie Review

The Firm. The Client. The Chamber. The Pelican Brief. The Rainmaker. And now Runaway Jury. Novelist John Grisham is nothing if not adored by Hollywood actors and directors (Gene Hackman, whose role in Runaway Jury is his third in a Grisham film, gushes, "He writes highly dramatic kinds of scenes for actors and we like that"). He's also entirely predictable. This time around, a New Orleans jury gets tampered with in a big gun manufacturer trial. The gun maker is in court defending itself against charges of "negligent distribution methods" that prosecutors say allowed a deranged day-trader to strafe his coworkers, killing 11 souls. On behalf of one of the widows, attorney Wendell Rohr files suit against the company that made the gun used in the terrible assault.

Working for the defense is Ramkin Fitch, a jury consultant who's hardly averse to resorting to bribery, blackmail and brutal intimidation to make sure his side wins. On this case, though, he's not the only one interested in manipulating the outcome. Juror number nine, Nick Easter, isn't there by accident. He got himself on this jury for a reason. A reason soon to become more than evident to Ramkin. So it's a covert war in and around the courthouse as Fitch and his team of high-tech specialists thrust and parry with Nick and his partner in crime, Marlee. Covert because if anyone's caught, the judge declares a mistrial; something nobody wants. War because there's potentially hundreds of millions of dollars at stake.


Positive Elements

For Wendell, there's more riding on this case than publicity, money and the respect of peers. He's in it for the principle of the thing. He cares about the outcome because he's convinced he can save lives by winning. So whether he's right or wrong, his motives are noble. He also makes a good point about how contemptuous spirits always turn malignant and ruin lives.

Spiritual Content

Early on, there's a remark made identifying Saint Catherine as the patron saint of unmarried women and jurists. Nick makes a point of looking for some sort of good luck charm that might help him avoid jury duty (not that he really wants off the jury). A rosary dangles from a cabby's rearview mirror. Fitch yells that he hates Baptists and Democrats with equal fervor. To win over his fellow jurors, Nick asks them to remember a soldier friend of his he says died in Iraq. When a woman suggests doing so by reciting the Lord's Prayer, he responds, "I couldn't ask anybody to pray." Later, he claims to be agnostic.

Sexual Content

Nick and Marlee turn out to be more than just "business" partners; they also share a bed. Marlee takes off her shirt (she's wearing a bra) and the two kiss passionately before the scene shifts to the next morning. Jokes are traded about a sex change operation, "big girls" and birth control.

Violent Content

The movie opens with scenes from the fateful shooting that prompts the trial. It's more intense than explicit as muzzle flashes and loud bangs send office workers scrambling for safety. Nick tussles with an intruder, then chases him to his car and smashes several of his windows with a metal pipe after being almost run down. Fitch's men trash Nick's apartment, then set it afire. Marlee also fights off an ill-intentioned man, stabbing him in the leg after they get into it at her home. She also hits him over the head with a beer bottle, pokes her fingers into his eyes and kicks him in the crotch and face. He tries to choke her, smashes her into a wall and comes at her with a knife.

Elsewhere, a prospective juror spreads fake blood on his shirt, prompting security guards to wrestle him to the ground and drag him out of the courtroom.

Crude or Profane Language

One f-word and a dozen s-words elevate the profanity count to about 40. Jesus' name is abused once. God's three or four times.

Drug and Alcohol Content

Fitch turns to booze when he's upset. Bar scenes include images of patrons drinking. A juror sneaks shots of whiskey during the trial (she's thrown off the jury for it). Another juror tries to commit suicide by combining alcohol with a bottle full of sleeping pills. A juror and other minor characters smoke.

Other Negative Elements

This movie makes a mockery of the judicial system by not just implying that jury tampering happens, but that it is routine and easy to get away with. Fitch insists "trials are too important to be left up to juries." Even when the judge finds out that one of the juror's apartment has been torched, he doesn't intervene. It's implied more than once that the only way to further one's agenda or beliefs is to lie and cheat.

Fitch declares that "fat women" make great jurors because they're "tight-fisted and unsympathetic." A juror is blackmailed with threats to expose her for having had an abortion. Another, who is HIV-positive, is also threatened with exposure.


I had hoped to write this review without diving into the murky waters of gun-control politics. But alas, the contents of Runaway Jury won't allow for that. So, without taking sides, I'll note that it is the anti-gun lobby that runs away with this jury—the one onscreen and the one sitting in theaters. Impassioned arguments are presented both for and against gun control, but there's no reasonable question about where the filmmakers' sympathies lie. The way the trial ends and the way scenes are couched indicate that gun makers should be held responsible for how their products are used and that the current legal effort to elevate levels of gun control is inherently more valid than efforts to prevent new laws.

Upon learning I was reviewing this film, a colleague remarked that she had read the book it was based on. "Was it good?" I questioned. "I'm sure it was," she responded, "but all of Grisham's books sort of blend together after awhile." As do his movies. Despite its inclination to pull the trigger on a heated handgun debate, there's very little here that sets this Grisham film apart from any other. It's a taut, courtroom drama dotted with desperate men and women with their claws fully extended, fighting for whatever it is they believe in—be that justice, revenge or lots and lots of money. Not that diehard fans will mind, especially since Runaway Jury's cast is A-list and its execution above average. Still, families interested in reading (seeing) this new chapter should take the time to carefully weigh all the evidence (political bias, depicted violence, brief sexuality and vulgar language) before crowding into the courtroom.

Pro-social Content

Objectionable Content

Summary Advisory

Plot Summary

Christian Beliefs

Other Belief Systems

Authority Roles



Discussion Topics

Additional Comments/Notes

Episode Reviews

We hope this review was both interesting and useful. Please share it with family and friends who would benefit from it as well.

Get weekly e-news, Culture Clips & more!